ABSTRACT
BackgroundEvidence from population-based studies on the impact of post COVID-19 condition (PCC) on ability to work is limited but critical due to its high prevalence among individuals of working-age. ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between PCC, work ability, and occupational changes. DesignPopulation-based, longitudinal cohort. SettingGeneral population, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland. Participants672 adults of working-age with SARS-CoV-2 infection. MeasurementsCurrent work ability, work ability related to physical and mental demands, and estimated future work ability in 2 years (assessed using Work Ability Index), as well as PCC-related occupational changes at one year after infection. ResultsThere was very strong evidence that current work ability scores were 0.62 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30 to 0.95) points lower among those with PCC compared to those without. Similarly, there was very strong evidence for lower odds of reporting higher work ability with respect to physical (odds ratio (OR) 0.30, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.46) and mental (OR 0.40, 0.27 to 0.62) demands among those with PCC compared to those without. Higher age and history of psychiatric diagnosis were associated with a more substantial reduction in current work ability. 5.8% of those with PCC reported direct effects of PCC on their occupational situation, with 1.6% of those with PCC completely dropping out of the workforce and 43% of those with PCC-related occupational changes reporting financial difficulties as a result. LimitationsSelection, use of self-reported outcome measures, and limited generalizability to individuals with most severe COVID-19 or following vaccination. ConclusionsThese findings highlight the need for providing support and interdisciplinary interventions to individuals affected by PCC to help them maintain or regain their work ability and productivity. Primary Funding SourceFederal Office of Public Health, Department of Health of the Canton of Zurich, University of Zurich Foundation, Switzerland. Study RegistrationISRCTN14990068.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental DisordersABSTRACT
The duration of immunity after first SARS-CoV-2 infection and the extent to which prior immunity prevents reinfection is uncertain and remains an important question within the context of new variants. Using a retrospective population-based matched observational study approach, we identified cases with a first PCR positive test between 01 March 2020 and 30 September 2020 and cases were matched by age, sex, upper tier local authority of residence and testing route to individuals testing negative in the same week (controls) by PCR. After a 90-day pre-follow up period for cases and controls, any subsequent positive tests up to 31 December 2020 and deaths within 28 days of testing positive were identified, this encompassed an essentially vaccine-free period. There were 517,870 individuals in the matched cohort with 2,815 reinfection cases and 12,098 first infections. The protective effect of a prior SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive episode was 78% (OR 0.22, 0.21-0.23). Protection rose to 82% (OR 0.18, 0.17-0.19) after a sensitivity analysis excluded 934 individuals with a first test between March and May and a subsequent positive test between June and September 2020. Amongst individuals testing positive by PCR during follow-up, reinfection cases had 77% lower odds of symptoms at the second episode (adjusted OR 0.23, 0.20-0.26) and 45% lower odds of dying in the 28 days after reinfection (adjusted OR 0.55, 0.42-0.71). Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection offered protection against reinfection in this population. There was some evidence that reinfections increased with the Alpha variant compared to the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 variant highlighting the importance of continued monitoring as new variants emerge.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Background Reinfection after primary SARS-CoV-2 infection is uncommon in adults, but little is known about the risks, characteristics, severity or outcomes of reinfection in children. Methods We used national SARS-CoV-2 testing data in England to estimate the risk of reinfection >90 days after primary infection from 01 January 2020 to 31 July 2021, which encompassed both the Alpha and Delta waves in England. Disease severity was assessed by linking reinfection cases to national hospitalisation, intensive care admission and death registrations datasets. Findings Reinfection rates closely followed community infection rates, with a small peak during the Alpha wave and a larger peak during the Delta wave. In children aged <16 years, there were 688,418 primary infections and 2,343 reinfections. The overall reinfection rate was 66.88/100,000 population, being higher in adults (72.53/100,000) than in children (21.53/100,000). Reinfection rates after primary infection were 0.68% overall, 0.73% in adults and 0.34% in children. Of the 109 reinfections in children admitted to hospital, 78 (72%) had underlying comorbidities. Hospitalisation rates were similar for the first (64/2343, 2.73%) and second episode (57/2343, 2.43%). Intensive care admission was rare after primary infection (n=7) or reinfection (n=4), mainly in children with comorbidities. 44 deaths occurred after primary infection within 28 days of diagnosis (44/688,418, 0.01%), none after possible reinfections. Interpretation The risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection is strongly related to exposure due to community infection rates, especially during the Delta variant wave. Children had a lower risk of reinfection than adults, but reinfections were not associated with more severe disease or fatal outcomes. Funding PHE/UKHSA
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , von Willebrand Disease, Type 3 , DeathABSTRACT
Background This study measured the long-term health-related quality of life of non-hospitalised COVID-19 cases with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2(+) infection using the recommended instrument in England (the EQ-5D). Methods Prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2(+) cases aged 12-85 years and followed up for six months from 01 December 2020, with cross-sectional comparison to SARS-CoV-2(-) controls. Main outcomes were loss of quality-adjusted life days (QALDs); physical symptoms; and COVID-19-related private expenditures. We analysed results using multivariable regressions with post-hoc weighting by age and sex, and conditional logistic regressions for the association of each symptom and EQ-5D limitation on cases and controls. Results Of 548 cases (mean age 41.1 years; 61.5% female), 16.8% reported physical symptoms at month 6 (most frequently extreme tiredness, headache, loss of taste and/or smell, and shortness of breath). Cases reported more limitations with doing usual activities than controls. Almost half of cases spent a mean of £18.1 on non-prescription drugs (median: £10.0), and 52.7% missed work or school for a mean of 12 days (median: 10). On average, all cases lost 15.9 (95%-CI: 12.1, 19.7) QALDs, while those reporting symptoms at month 6 lost 34.1 (29.0, 39.2) QALDs. Losses also increased with older age. Cumulatively, the health loss from morbidity contributes at least 21% of the total COVID-19-related disease burden in England. Conclusions One in 6 cases report ongoing symptoms at 6 months, and 10% report prolonged loss of function compared to pre-COVID-19 baselines. A marked health burden was observed among older COVID-19 cases and those with persistent physical symptoms. summary Losses of health-related quality of life in non-hospitalised COVID-19 cases increase by age and for cases with symptoms after 6 months. At a population level, at least 21% of the total COVID-19-related disease burden in England is attributable to morbidity.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , DyspneaABSTRACT
Background: The full reopening of schools in September 2020 was associated with an increase in COVID-19 cases and outbreaks in educational settings across England. Methods: Primary and secondary schools reporting an outbreak (≥2 laboratory-confirmed cases within 14 days) to Public Health England (PHE) between 31 August and 18 October 2020 were contacted to complete an online questionnaire. Interpretation: There were 969 primary (n=450) and secondary school outbreaks (n=519) reported to PHE, representing 3% of primary schools and 15% of secondary schools in England. Of the 369 schools contacted, 190 geographically-representative schools completed the questionnaire; 2,425 cases were reported. Secondary school students (1.20%; 95%CI, 1.13-1.28%) had higher attack rates than primary school students (0.84%; 95%CI, 0.75-0.94%). Outbreaks were larger and across more year groups in secondary schools than in primary schools. When an outbreak occurred, attack rates were higher in staff (926/19,083; 4.85%; 95%CI, 4.55-5.17%) than students, especially among primary school teaching staff (9.81%; 95%CI, 8.90-10.82%) compared to secondary school teaching staff (3.97%; 95%CI, 3.79-5.69%). Staff represented 59% (471/799) of cases in primary school outbreaks and 27% (410/1515) in secondary schools (P<0.001). Teaching staff were more likely to be the index case in primary (48/100, 48%) than in secondary (25/79, 32%) schools (P=0.027).Conclusions: Secondary schools were more likely to be affected by a COVID-19 outbreak than primary schools and to experience larger outbreaks across multiple school years. The higher attack rate among teaching staff during an outbreak suggests that additional protective measures may be needed. Funding: PHE
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Background: The full reopening of schools in September 2020 was associated with an increase in COVID-19 cases and outbreaks in educational settings across England.Methods: Primary and secondary schools reporting an outbreak (≥2 laboratory-confirmed cases within 14 days) to Public Health England (PHE) between 31 August and 18 October 2020 were contacted to complete an online questionnaire.Interpretation: There were 969 primary (n=450) and secondary school outbreaks (n=519) reported to PHE, representing 3% of primary schools and 15% of secondary schools in England. Of the 369 schools contacted, 190 geographically-representative schools completed the questionnaire; 2,425 cases were reported. Secondary school students (1.20%; 95%CI, 1.13-1.28%) had higher attack rates than primary school students (0.84%; 95%CI, 0.75-0.94%). Outbreaks were larger and across more year groups in secondary schools than in primary schools. When an outbreak occurred, attack rates were higher in staff (926/19,083; 4.85%; 95%CI, 4.55-5.17%) than students, especially among primary school teaching staff (378/3852; 9.81%; 95%CI, 8.90-10.82%) compared to secondary school teaching staff (284/7146; 3.97%; 95%CI, 3.79-5.69%). Staff represented 59% (471/799) of cases in primary school outbreaks and 27% (410/1515) in secondary schools (P<0.001). Teaching staff were more likely to be the index case in primary (48/100, 48%) than in secondary (25/79, 32%) schools (P=0.027). Conclusions: Secondary schools were more likely to be affected by a COVID-19 outbreak than primary schools and to experience larger outbreaks across multiple school years. The higher attack rate among teaching staff during an outbreak suggests that additional protective measures may be needed.Funding Statement: This surveillance was internally funded by PHE and did not receive any specific grant funding from agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.Ethics Approval Statement: PHE has legal permission, provided by Regulation 3 of The Health Service (Control of Patient Information) Regulations 2002, to process patient confidential information for national surveillance of communicable diseases and as such, individual patient consent is not required.